Why art can be «capital»
Abstract
The author shows how art is transformed into symbolic capital based on public recognition that artistic value does not exist in isolation: it is produced and confirmed by institutions of legitimation, and can then be converted into economic benefits, social connections, and influence.
References
1. Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital // Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education / ed. by J. Richardson. – New York, 1986. P. 241–258.
2. Bourdieu P. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature / ed. and introd. by R. Johnson. – Cambridge, 1993.
3. Bourdieu P. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste / trans. by R. Nice. – Cambridge (MA), 1984.
4. Kossowska I. Cultural Diplomacy and Informal Artistic Relations in East Central Europe in the 20th Century: A Global Perspective // Arts. 2025. Vol. 14, №2. Art. 41. Doi: 10.3390/arts14020041.
5. McKercher A. The Art of Soft Power at Expo 67: Creative America and Cultural Diplomacy in the US Pavilion // Journal of Curatorial Studies. 2016. Vol. 5, №3. Doi: 10.1386/jcs.5.3.368_1. P. 368–389.
6. Anholt S. Beyond the Nation Brand: The Role of Image and Identity in International Relations // Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy. 2011. Vol. 2, №1. Art. 1.
Review
For citations:
Borozna M. Why art can be «capital». Science and Innovations. 2026;(2):31-34. (In Russ.)
Views:
50
JATS XML
Email this article 