Preview

Science and Innovations

Advanced search

Methods for studying status resources in geopolitics

Abstract

The article systematizes research approaches to studying symbolic capital in geopolitical processes. It shows how the struggle for recognition, status, and legitimacy unfolds against the backdrop of multipolarity, competing narratives, and the digital mediatization of international relations. Proxy indicators and criteria for recognition are proposed.

About the Author

N. Kutuzova
Институт философии НАН Беларуси
Russian Federation

Natalia Kutuzova



References

1. Bourdieu P. The Forms of Capital // Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education / ed. by J. Richardson. – New York, 1986. P. 241–258.

2. Bourdieu P. Language and Symbolic Power / ed. by J. B. Thompson; trans. by G. Raymond, M. Adamson. – Cambridge, 1991.

3. Beaumont P., Rоren P. Status Symbols in World Politics // Cooperation and Conflict. 2025. Vol. 60. N1. P. 3–26. Doi: 10.1177/00108367241311072.

4. Adler-Nissen R. Symbolic Power in European Diplomacy: The Struggle Between National Foreign Services and the EU’s External Action Service // Review of International Studies. 2014. Vol. 4 0, N4. P. 657– 681. Doi: 10.1017/S0260210513000326.

5. Harracá M., Castelló I., Gawer A. How Digital Platforms Organize Immaturity: A Sociosymbolic Framework of Platform Power // Business Ethics Quarterly. 2023. Vol. 33, N3. P. 440–472. Doi: 10.1017/beq.2022.40.

6. Nye J.S. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. – New York, 2004.

7. Verwiebe R.; Hagemann S. Bourdieu Revisited: New Forms of Digital Capital – Emergence, Reproduction, Inequality of Distribution // Information, Communication & Society. 2024. P. 1–23. Doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2024.2358170.

8. Rodríguez-Camacho J.A. Digital Capital: Importance for Social Status in Contemporary Society and Antecedents of Its Accumulation / J.A. RodríguezCamacho, M. Linder, D. Jütte, T. Hennig-Thurau // Computers in Human Behavior. 2024. Vol. 159. 108316. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2024.108316//https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224001845.

9. Szondi G. Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations «Clingendael», 2008 // https://www.clingendael.org/publication/public-diplomacyand-nation-branding-conceptual-similarities-and-differences.

10. Removing Myanmar Military Officials From Facebook // Meta Newsroom. 2018. Aug. 28 // https://about.fb.com/news/2018/08/removing-myanmar-officials.

11. Europol and Telegram take on terrorist propaganda online // Europol Newsroom. 2019. Nov. 25 // https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/ europol-and-telegram-take-terrorist-propaganda-online.

12. Conway, M. Encrypted Extremism / M. Conway, S. Macdonald, R. Lewis. – Washington, 2019 // https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/EncryptedExtremism.pdf.


Review

For citations:


Kutuzova N. Methods for studying status resources in geopolitics. Science and Innovations. 2026;(2):17-20. (In Russ.)

Views: 65

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1818-9857 (Print)
ISSN 2412-9372 (Online)