Assessing the development level of smart cities in China
https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2024-10-60-68
Abstract
A methodology for assessing the level of development of smart cities in China is presented, developed by ranking three approaches (a weighted sum of WSM criteria with equal weights, a sum of criteria combined with the EWM entropy weighing method, a combined EWM-TOPSIS method based on calculating the degree of proximity between the current situation and its "ideal" state), which made it possible to determine promising areas of their sustainable development. Among them: improving the digital literacy of residents and growing digital talents, improving smart infrastructure, improving smart management capabilities through digital technologies, growing the digital economy and creating smart industries, promoting the urban environment, and ensuring smart living.
References
1. Urban population (% of total population) / World Bank // https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?view=chart.
2. Построение новой модели интеграции и развития между городами и сельскими районами / China Daily // https://china.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202403/13/WS65f1661ea3109f7860dd5416.html (накит. яз.).
3. Уведомление о запуске национального пилотного проекта умного города / Министерство жилищного строительства и городского и сельского развития Китая // https://law168.com.cn/doc/view?id=167540 (накит. яз.).
4. Белая книга по умным городам / Китайский исследовательский центр по развитию промышленной информационной безопасности.– Пекин, 2022 (накит. яз.).
5. Odendaal N. Information and communication technology and local governance: understanding the difference between cities in developed and emerging economies // Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2003. №27. P.585–607.
6. Smart cities / European Comission // https://ec.europa.eu/info/eu-regional-and-urbandevelopment/topics/cities-and-urban-development/city-initiatives/smart-cities_en.
7. Meijer A., Rodríguez-Bolívar M.P. Governing the Smart City: a Review of the Literature on Smart Urban Governance // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2015. №81(2). P.1–17.
8. Winters J.V. Why are Smart Cities Growing? Who Moves and Who Stays // Journal of Regional Science. 2011. Vol. 51. №2. P.253–270.
9. Лю Шуян, Ли Сируй. Умное городское управление: изменение государственной модели предоставления общественных услуг // Социальная наука. 2019. №1. C. 26–34 (на кит. яз.).
10. Akande A. [et al.]. The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe // Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019. №44. P.475–487.
11. Kourtit K., Nijkamp P.Smart cities in the innovation age // Innovation. 2012. №2. P.93–95.
12. Nesti G. Defining and assessing the transformational nature of smart city governance: Insights from four European cases // International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2020. №1. P.20–37.
13. Batty M. [et al.]. Smart Cities of the Future // The European Physical Journal. 2012. №214. P.481–518.
14. Giffinger R., Gudrun H. Smart Cities Ranking: An Effective Instrument for the Positioning of Cities? // Architecture, City and Environment. 2010. Vol. 4. №12. P.7–25.
15. Nam T., PardoT.A.Conceptualizing Smart City with Dimensions of Technology, People, and Institutions // Proc. 12th Conference on Digital Government Research, College Park, MD, June 12–15, 2011. P.282–291.
16. Yuxin Zhu, Dazuo Tian, Feng Yan. Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in DecisionMaking // Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2020. Vol. 2020. P.1–5.
17. Madanchian M., Taherdoost H. A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making // Sustainable Social Development. 2023. Vol. 1. №1. Р. 1–6.
18. Ding Lin. [et al.]. A Comprehensive Evaluation of Urban Sustainable Development in China Based on the TOPSIS-Entropy Method // Sustainability. 2016. №746. Р. 1–23.
19. Liu Yang [et al.]. Evaluation of New Power System Based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Method // Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2022. №7. P.1–10.
20. План действий по умному Пекину / Народное правительство города Пекина // https://www.beijing.gov.cn/zhengce/zfwj/zfwj/szfwj/201905/t20190523_72559.html (на кит. яз.).
21. Статистический бюллетень национального экономического и социального развития Пекина за 2023 год / Муниципальное бюро статистики Пекина // https://tjj.beijing.gov.cn/tjsj_31433/tjgb_31445/ndgb_31446/202403/t20240321_3595860.html (на кит. яз.).
22. Шанхайский трехлетний план действий по содействию строительству умного города (2011–2013гг.) / Шанхайская муниципальная комиссия по экономике и информационным технологиям // https://app.sheitc.sh.gov.cn/szfgh/652766.htm (на кит. яз.).
23. Статистический бюллетень национального экономического и социального развития Шанхая за 2023 год / Муниципальное бюро статистики Шанхая // https://tjj.sh.gov.cn/tjgb/20240321/f66c5b25ce604a1f9af755941d5f454a.html (на кит. яз.).
Review
For citations:
Golovenchik G., Qianwen X. Assessing the development level of smart cities in China. Science and Innovations. 2024;(10):60-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2024-10-60-68
Views: 99
Email this article 