Differences in the parameters of the unpaired branches of the abdominal aorta in men with different body types
https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2021-3-67-71
Abstract
The article studies the features of the morphometric parameters of unpaired branches of the abdominal aorta in men with different types of physique. An analysis was made of computer scans of the abdominal part of the aorta and its unpaired branches in adult men with different body types, аccording to the classification by V.N. Shevkunenko and According to Pignet index.When using the index V.N. Shevkunenko from the studied angular parameters reliably differs only the angle of discharge of the superior mesenteric artery, in groups systematized by the Pignet index, differences are observed in all angular parameters. Due to the fact that the classification by V.N. Shevkunenko reflects to a greater degree the linear parameters of the body, and the Pignet index is also voluminous (chest girth, body weight), the latter provides a greater number of differences in the compared parameters of the abdominal aorta and its unpaired branches, including those depending on the type and degree of development of the abdominal fat fiber
About the Authors
V. Grishechkin
Гомельский государственный медицинский университет, American college of surgeons
Belarus
Belarus
D. Vvedensky
Гомельский государственный медицинский университет
Belarus
Belarus
References
1. Бархатов И.В, Бархатова Н. А. Эхографические способы диагностики и нормальные показатели кровотока в непарных висцеральных ветвях брюшной аорты // Вестник новых медицинских технологий. 2016.
2. Великорецкий А. Н. Оперативное лечение рака поджелудочной железы. – М., 1959.
3. Сапин М. Р. Анатомия человека. – М., 1997.
4. Семиошко Н. В. Вариантная анатомия ветвления чревного ствола и прилежащих к нему лимфатических узлов // Педиатрический вестник Южного Урала. 2015. №1. С. 37–42.
5. Da Silveira L.A, Silveira F. B.C, Fazan V. P.S. Arterial diameter of the celiac trunk and its branches: anatomical study // Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 2009. №24 (1). P. 43–47.
6. 6. Gangam R. R., Lakmala V. A morphometric study of branching pattern of Inferior Mesenteric artery // International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences. 2016. №7 (2). P. 19–25.
7. Joh J. H., Ahn H. J., Park H. C. Reference Diameters of the Abdominal Aorta and Iliac Arteries in the Korean Population // Yonsei Medical Journal. 2013. №54 (1). P. 48–54.
8. Länne T., Sonesson B., Bergqvist D., Bengtsson H., Gustafsson D. Diameter and compliance in the male human abdominal aorta: Influence of age and aortic aneurysm // European Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1992, №6 (2). P. 178–84.
9. Malnar D., Klasan G., Miletić D., Bajek S., Vranić T. S., Arbanas J., Bobinac D., Coklo M. Properties of the Celiac Trunk – Anatomical study // Coll. Antropol. 2010. №34 (3). P. 917–921.
10. Solberg S., Forsdahl S. H., Singh K., Jacobsen B. K. Diameter of the Infrarenal Aorta as a Risk Factor for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: The Tromsø Study, 1994–2001 // European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2010. №39 (3). P. 280.
11. Songür A., Toktaş M., Alkoç O., Acar T., Uzun İ., Baş O., et al. Abdominal Aorta and Its Branches: Morphometry – Variations In Autopsy Cases // European Journal of General Medicine. 2010. №7. P. 321–325.
12. Tanka M., Abazaj E. Anatomical variations of celiac trunk anatomy and their clinical importance // Int. J. of science and research. 2013. №4 (12). P. 12–14.
13. White R. D., Weir-McCall J.R., Sullivan C. M., Mustafa S. A.R., Yeap P. M., Budak M. J., et al. The Celiac Axis Revisited: Anatomic Variants, Pathologic Features, and Implications for Modern Endovascular Management // RadioGraphics. 2015. №35(3). P. 879–898.
14. Winston C. B., Lee N. A., Jarnagin W. R., Teitcher J., DeMatteo R.P., Fong Y., et al. CT Angiography for Delineation of Celiac and Superior Mesenteric Artery Variants in Patients Undergoing Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery // American Journal of Roentgenology. 2007. №1 (189). P. 13–19.
Review
For citations:
Grishechkin V., Vvedensky D. Differences in the parameters of the unpaired branches of the abdominal aorta in men with different body types. Science and Innovations. 2021;(3):67-71. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.29235/1818-9857-2021-3-67-71
Views: 89
Email this article 